Study: Covid Vaccines May “Sensitize Vaccine Recipients To More Severe Disease”

A few studies have raised concerns about the covid vaccines, claiming that they may make people more susceptible to other diseases in the long term.

By CE Staff Writer  10 minute read

Is the covid vaccine extremely safe and effective as the mainstream claims? Many would argue that it’s not as safe as it’s being made out to be. Stories of adverse reactions and deaths after the vaccine have been shared across social media networks since the vaccine began to roll out for citizens. Examples have come from multiple countries, like Norway, where there were more than two dozen deaths among senior citizens after the administration of the pfizer shot, the same thing has happened in Germany. A physician’s wife took to Facebook in the United States explaining how her husband died shortly after vaccine administration, and these seem to be a few of many examples. In the United States, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows 1,739 deaths reported, and 734 permanent disabilities and nearly 4,000 hospitalizations thus far.

This may seem like a lot, but it’s easily argued that it’s not, and that’s because more than 80 million people have already had at least one dose of the vaccine in the United States, and approximately 450 million people across the globe have had the same. That’s nearly one billion people. If you do the math simply using the numbers in the United States, there doesn’t seem to be much of an argument. It’s highly unlikely that you’re going to be severely injured by the vaccine or die. The odds seem to be extremely low.

That being said, it’s also important to mention that VAERS has been estimated to capture approximately one percent of vaccine injuries because the majority of them are believed to be unreported.  A 2010 HHS pilot study by the Federal Agency for Health Care Research (AHCR) in the United States found that 1 in every 39 vaccines causes injury, a shocking comparison to the claims from the CDC of 1 in every million.

For example, From 1990 to 2007 there were about 80,000 US cases of Kawasaki disease; during the same period just 56 US cases were reported to VAERS–0.07%. (Hua et al, Pediatr Inf Dis J 2009: 28:943-947) The cause of KD is unknown; it is rare, it is very serious, and it is prevalent among young and frequently vaccinated children. If any event deserves prompt reporting to VAERS it is Kawasaki disease, but this does not happen.

There are also concerns regarding long term health, more on that in a bit.

In my opinion, the number of injuries and reported deaths so far warrant freedom of choice. Furthermore, there are a lot of questions regarding the effectiveness of the COVID vaccine. (How effective is the covid vaccine)?  Making the vaccine mandatory to eat at certain restaurants, travel, and attend school perhaps is raising great cause for concern among many experts in the field, but you don’t hear about them because they’ve been heavily censored. For example, I recently published an article about  Jonas F. Ludvigsson, a paediatrician at Örebro University Hospital and professor of clinical epidemiology at the Karolinska Institute. He has announced that he is quitting his work on covid-19 because of harassment from people who dislike what he discovered, that no schoolchildren (nearly two million) died from covid during the first wave despite schools being open, no lockdown and no mask mandates.

Martin Kulldorff, a medical professor at Harvard university and vaccine safety expert recently tweeted,

After having protecting themselves while working class were exposed to the virus, the vaccinated #Zoomers now want #VaccinePassports where immunity from prior infection does not count, despite stronger evidence for protection. One more assault on working people. 

There are multiple studies hinting at the point the professor makes, that those who have been infected with covid may have have immunity for years, and possibly even decades. For example, according to a new study authored by respected scientists at leading labs, individuals who recovered from the coronavirus developed “robust” levels of B cells and T cells (necessary for fighting off the virus) and “these cells may persist in the body for a very, very long time.” This is just one of many examples. There are studies that suggest infection to prior coronaviruses, which prior to covid-19 circles the globe infecting hundreds of millions of people every single year, can also provide protection from covid-19.

Furthermore, we are dealing with a virus that has a 99.95-97 percent survival rate for people under the age of 70.  With this information, why would the push for vaccine mandates, like “vaccine passports” for example, be so strong?  How effective is the vaccine compared to natural immunity? Can it even prevent infection?

Dr. Peter Doshi, an associate editor at the British Medical Journal published a piece in the Journal issuing a word of caution about the supposed “95% Effective” COVID vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna. You can access that here.

What about the catastrophic harms and uselessness of lockdowns that continue to remain ignored within the mainstream?

“Sensitize Vaccine Recipients To More Severe Disease”

A few other papers have raised concerns as well, for example. A study published in October of 2020 in the International Journal of Clinical Practice states:

COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

In a new research article published in Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, veteran immunologist J. Bart Classen expresses similar concerns and writes that “RNA-based COVID vaccines have the potential to cause more disease than the epidemic of COVID-19.”

For decades, Classen has published papers exploring how vaccination can give rise to chronic conditions such as Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes — not right away, but three or four years down the road. In this latest paper, Classen warns that the RNA-based vaccine technology could create “new potential mechanisms” of vaccine adverse events that may take years to come to light.

Millions of people and children get vaccinated without any adverse reactions. It’s easy why so many believe they are completely safe. But what about long term consequences and the concerns raised above. The list of long term concerns are many when it comes to vaccines. For example, what about aluminum containing vaccines? Science shows us that injected aluminum doesn’t come into the same methods of excretion as ingested aluminum, and that it may persist within the body and end up the brain where it is detectable, at least in animal models, years later. You can read more about that and access some of the science here.  This implicates aluminum containing vaccines in variety of diseases, like alzheimer’s disease, autism and parkinson’s for example, yet when you mention this it’s instantaneously shut down. When that happens and science is ignored and unacknowledged, we are not living in an age of science but rather an age of corruption and dogma.

A few years ago, a team of Scandinavian scientists conducted a study and found that African children inoculated with the DTP (diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis) vaccine, during the early 1980s had a 5-10 times greater mortality than their unvaccinated peers.

They state,

It should be of concern that the effect of routine vaccinations on all-cause mortality was not tested in randomized trials.All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.Though a vaccine protects children against the target disease it may simultaneously increase susceptibility to unrelated infections.

Furthermore, there are questions with regards to the effectiveness of some vaccines. Take the MMR vaccine as an example. There are many examples of measles outbreaks in fully vaccinated people. You can read and learn more about that here and here.

These and many other reasons are why vaccine hesitancy continues to grow. Especially with the covid vaccine.  Riverside County, California has a population of approximately 2.4 million, and about 50 percent of healthcare workers in the county are refusing to take the COVID-19 vaccine despite the fact that they have top priority and access to it.  At Providence Holy Cross Medical Center in Mission Hills, one in five frontline nurses and doctors have declined the shot. Roughly 20% to 40% of L.A. County’s frontline workers who were offered the vaccine did the same, according to county public health officials. You can read more about that story here.

A survey conducted at Chicago’s Loretto Hospital shows that only 40 percent of healthcare workers will not take the COVID-19 vaccine once it’s available to them. You can read more about that story here.

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) protects the vaccine manufacturers (pharmaceutical companies) from any liability, and the money comes out of the taxpayers pocket. In the United States, the VICP has paid out more than $4 billion dollars due to vaccine injuries. Since 2015, the program has paid out an average total of $216 million to an average of 615 claimants each year.

All of this and more, in my opinion, makes vaccine mandates completely baseless, immoral and unscientific. Should we really give governments and private corporations the power to implement such measures? All of this is done on the assumption that vaccines are extremely effective and it’s all done on the basis of “herd immunity.” Should mandates be allowed when things are not so black and white as they are marketed to be?

In a 2014 analysis in the Oregon Law Review by New York University (NYU) legal scholars Mary Holland and Chase E. Zachary (who also has a Princeton-conferred doctorate in chemistry), the authors claim that 60 years of compulsory vaccine policies “have not attained herd immunity for any childhood disease.” This is one of multiple reasons why so many suggest voluntary choice as opposed to vaccine mandates.

The legal scholars’ review discusses a number of other problems that make the theoretical concepts of vaccine efficacy and herd immunity highly imperfect in practice and, in fact, unachievable.

Perhaps the world would be a better place if, when it comes to vaccines and other measures to combat covid, they were simply encouraged and recommended rather than mandated. Using coercion and the threat of taking away rights and freedoms under the guise of good will is never a good idea.

When it comes to covid, other successful treatments have been ridiculed and ignored, deaths that are not a result of covid have been marked as covid deaths, and there seems to be large amounts of corruption that has plagued the “science” behind this virus. The good news is that covid has been a catalyst for so many people on our planet to see this type of activity, something that may not have been visible to them before. It’s been a great catalyst for a shift in human consciousness, just like 9/11.

This article was originally posted by Collective Evolution


Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on email
Share on whatsapp

Related Posts